Hoaxing A Lawsuit

Those still believing that Michael Jackson faked his death cannot have missed the fact that Katherine Jackson, and the three kids of Michael, have a wrongful death lawsuit against AEG Live. For the grand total of $40 BILLION.

Putting aside the fact that the lawsuit has done nothing but give the media a chance to drag up more shit than a sewage farm on its busiest day. The lawsuit has killed the hoax. It is proof that there is no:

• Game
• Hoax
• Comeback

I mean you can take the fanciful idea that Michael Jackson is hiding with Elvis, reading the Seventh Day Adventist literature, planning a comeback while keeping various informants (read as bullshit artists) and clues all up-to-date, if you want. But if you do what does that say about the family?

Seriously, mention in to any hoaxer about the Jackson family being nothing more than money-hungry leeches sucking the very life out of the MJ legacy and a good majority of them will act like you just said God doesn't exist, Jesus was a historical David Blaine, and the only thing after this life is that is you are worm food or ashes.

But what about the hoaxers. What do they say? I really don't know anymore. To be honest it all got a bit crazy in old hoax land. Souza launched some religious website bullshit (you cannot tell me you didn't see that coming), and every song, movie, and news event since the dawn of time is some clue Michael Jackson left before he faked his death. Oh, and don't forget the fact that Michael Jackson chose TMZ as his way of telling all the true beLIEvers.

If you look at what the hoaxers are saying by still hanging on to the idea that Michael Jackson is still alive you can read the subtext, and that is not a pretty picture. If you believe that Michael Jackson faked his death the subtext is:

Katherine Jackson is a hypocrite - As a devout Jehovah Witness she is getting up and falsely testifying in a court of law. This is called perjury, and as a Jehovah Witness she can be disfellowshipped for doing so.

Paris Jackson attempted suicide - Michael Jackson, in the pursuit of the all-mighty dollar from the comeback of the century, allowed his daughter to become so depressed with everything and attempt to kill herself.

The family is in turmoil - With all the in-family disagreements, fighting, and arguments since June 25, 2009 Michael Jackson has supposedly just sat back allowing this to go on.

OK, maybe, and it is a big maybe, the family don't know and they think he is dead. But then that means that the hoaxers are painting one of the most evil pictures of Michael Jackson ever. It would mean that his mother, and kids, all grieved for him without knowing he is alive and well and living with Elvis and all that.

You can only have it one way though. Either the family do know and Michael Jackson is allowing his mother and children to commit perjury just so that they can make $40 Billion. Or they don't know and each and every hoaxer thinks Michael Jackson is some sicko that is allowing his mother and kids to grieve, and all the other difficulties, while he plans some comeback.

Either way it doesn't do much for the legacy of Michael Jackson.

There is a third possibility. He is dead. The hoax was a fanciful idea for a while but in the reality of life, and what the kids and family are going through, is so unlikely it is laughable.

Talking With Homeless Dave

There has been some debate over the last few months. Some thought he was hiding, while others thought he had finally been arrested and executed. But in a revealing talk Homeless Dave explains himself.

Doggie: Well look who the cat dragged in. And where have you been the last few months?
Dave: I went on a journey of self-discovery, to find myself.
Doggie: And that journey obviously didn't include a shower.
Dave: I'm living the bohemian lifestyle now.
Doggie: No. You are just lazy. I doubt you even know what it means.
Dave: Actually I do.
Doggie: Keep telling yourself that. So, now you have found yourself what are you up to?
Dave: Not much really. I'm just strapping myself in for the kamikaze ride that is going to be the unlawful death trial.
Doggie: I knew it. So you have an opinion and you want to voice it is what you are saying?
Dave: Pretty much.
Doggie: OK then. What is your well-informed opinion?
Dave: Firstly it is not well-informed. Secondly this has got to be the dumbest lawsuit the Jackson family could have ever started.
Doggie: Well, supposedly, they want justice for Michael.
Dave: Do they hell as like. They want money. They want $40 Billion from AEG Live because they may, or may not, have hired Conrad Murray. They just want their meal-ticket to keep feeding the leeches that hang around the Jackson compound. If it was about justice it would just be a case of getting AEG Live to admit they were wrong, and not all about money.
Doggie: There is some logic to that. But surely the kids should get what their father was going to provide?
Dave: How much do they need? They have money coming in from the estate. They are definitely not hurting - now or ever. None of them would have to work ever. And his Mom is set for life too. They have millions from the estate, living it large, and we are meant to believe that a $40 Billion lawsuit is purely for justice. It is a typical Jackson family move - everyone trying to squeeze one more ounce of blood out of Michael.
Doggie: But the lawsuit is by Katherine and the kids. Surely you can't be calling them leeches?
Dave: In a way yes.
Doggie: Whoa there. Bit harsh.
Dave: Well not them exactly. Everyone knows there are certain family members in the background pulling strings to get things like this happening. And those people are doing it because they are scared.
Doggie: Scared of what?
Dave: Scared they will have to get off their asses and get out there and actually make it based on their own name. Don't get me wrong it isn't all of them but there a few they wouldn't know what to do without money from Michael, and his legacy, filtering down to the lower leeches. And as for Katherine and the kids - they have enough. This lawsuit is just going to make things worse.
Doggie: Worse in what way?
Dave: Don't be so naive. The muck-rakers. Scum like TMZ, X17, and all the other low-life outlets that will drag up every little detail. These places are used to having to report on what shit Kim Kardashian is wearing. Give them a $40 Billion lawsuit and they will run with every little thing. They will drag so much shit up from the past that the only thing, win or lose, that is guaranteed to happen is that Michal Jackson's legacy will be further tarnished with so-called revelations from the lawsuit.
Doggie: Well them kind of gossip outlets will always find the worse in a story.
Dave: It isn't just about finding the worse in a story. They are consistently noted for making shit up just to get people to look at their stuff. They will put any headline up if they think it will equal a few hits to their website. How many times during this lawsuit do you think TMZ will quote Arnie Klein, Karen Faye, or some other fucker that has no life of their own and is basically living off the tailcoat of Michael? Mark my words by the end of this lawsuit Michael's reputation will be in ruins because of all the crap people are going to drag up from the past.
Doggie: How do you see the result of the trial?
Dave: Nobody will win.
Doggie: I think you'll find someone has to win.
Dave: On paper maybe. But look at the options. Say the Jacksons win and some judge orders AEG Live to pay out $40 Billion. All that will happen is that AEG Live will go bankrupt and sell their assets to their parent company who will start a new company called AEG2 or something. Look at what BP did after the oil spill, they moved cash around and declared parts of themselves bankrupt and instead f paying $60 Billion only ended up paying $6 Billion. There are people, and businesses, down there still effected by all that. These places employ hundreds of attorneys that know every little trick in the book. If there is a way out without paying they will find it. They'd rather spend a few million than a few billion.
Doggie: But what if the Jacksons lose?
Dave: They already have. Win or lose they have lost. Say this trial goes on for 9 months, at the end the media will have raised all the usual crap from the 2005 trial, they will have alleged news stories confirming Michael Jackson as drug-riddled junkie, and the kids will have been dragged into court for all of this shit. Like I said nothing good will come of this lawsuit. And let us not forget that Murray has already been convicted.
Doggie: That is going to make a difference?
Dave: Of course it is. Murray has been convicted, the contract was never signed so legally is void, so the whole 'smoking gun' emails that people sent are worthless in a court of law. Doesn't matter what they say. If Murray wasn't legally working for AEG Live then they are merely opinion. And as it goes right now AEG Live have it from evidence in the Murray trial, which the State raised, that the contract had not been signed by Michael. So the whole email thing is a moot point.
Doggie: Scarily enough I see where you are coming from on that.
Dave: The only reason that the Jackson family is going after AEG Live is because they know it is pointless to go after Murray. He's in jail, he has no money, and his chances of employment are slim. He'll more than likely end up flipping burgers at the local McDonalds. Nobody is going to want the doctor that killed Michael Jackson to look after them.
Doggie: OK. But say the hoaxers are right. Say it is all some game.
Dave: Listen to yourself. A game? Look, the hoaxers use the whole "4 years to get it right" speech as some sort of clue. Well, in a couple of months the 4 years will be done. Nobody is coming back to 'BAM'. It was a nice idea, but that is all it was, and all it ever will be. An idea. Things have moved on too far.
Doggie: In what way?
Dave: Well, as Katherine and the kids are listed as plaintiffs in the wrongful death lawsuit you have two choices. They don't know Michael is alive which means he did all this without telling them, and they think he is dead. Or his Mom and kids have committed perjury already, with the depositions, and if AEG Live pay even a penny it is fraud. You can't have it both ways. Everyone needs to move on and let the legacy of Michael be as it is and not allow this ridiculous lawsuit to tarnish it - which it will do, the gutter media will make sure of that.
Doggie: OK. Well that about wraps it up.
Dave: You don't want to know what I have been up to for the past few months?
Doggie: To be honest - not really. I think most people have forgotten you even existed.
Dave: Well then. Next time I have an opinion I'll make sure TMZ get the exclusive.
Doggie: I won't hold my breath waiting to read that.

MJHD Vs SeeingClues

I'm sure most are aware that the major news today is that SeeingClues has three user names on MJHD.NET. Yes, things have got that slow in the hoax, that this topic has 20 pages as I write this.

The problem I have is that it has been made public. Personally I don't give two shits if SeeingClues has 3 or 33 accounts on MJHD.NET but for the moderators and administrator to publish this fact is fucking wrong beyond belief. A simple PM to SeeingClues would of been enough if you want them to use just one account. You don't need to start whining like a fucking bunch of pigs on a public forum about it.

It is going to somewhat kill my soul to agree with Rubis1966 but it should have been a private warning. This is what creates drama. Something which could have been settled without all the bullshit drama was dragged out in to the forum instead of between the Admin/Mods and SeeingClues.

Lara the Admin wrote "Everyone has the right to explain themselves, of course we are NOT going to ban everybody who has more than 1 username, they will have to choose 1, and of course, everybody deserves a second chance." This is after it has been dragged in front of the kangaroo court that is the rest of the members? What about a right to MJHD.NET being straight with all their members and if there is a problem discussing it with them first?

For a forum that is not allowed to discuss Souza and Mo because there may be some sort of lawsuit it seems very hypercritical to allow all the members to discuss another member. Maybe SeeingClues should threaten a lawsuit over the lack of privacy shown - then maybe they will get treated the same as Souza, Mo, and Badkolo on the MJHD.NET forum.

Come on the 3 stooges are afforded every right in the world because they threatened a bullshit lawsuit, but the members of MJHD make one mistake and the moderators are instantly figuratively frog-marching members in front of members.

Will the same mods, and the Admin, be happy this time next week when the whole forum is paranoid? They created this shit by not talking to the member first. It is fucked up that three people (Souza, Mo, Badkolo) are afforded more rights and more protection than the members.

Actually it is fucking bullshit that two dutch fucking lesbians and a broke faggot cannot be talked about because they said they were going to launch a lawsuit. Yet a member can be questioned by the moderating police and other members. Fucking bullshit.

I don't make recommendations too often, especially to particular persons, but SeeingClues if your reading this, get your ass out of there because unless you yell "lawsuit" at the top of your voice it would appear the moderators can walk all over the members.

Peace.

Legal Notice: This post was based on the first 6 pages of the post. Kangaroo courts are neither fun or worth reading most of the time.

MJHD.NET Needs A Backbone

Over at MJHD.NET, moderator Wozniack posted an announcement under the title of "An Important Announcement Regarding MJHD.NET, Please Read..." Now I know it was posted on January 18, 2010 but it was brought to the forefront because there was a topic on MJHD.NET about Souza and Mo being interviewed by Gary James of ClassicBands.COM - well it wasn't really an interview as the questions were pretty lame and there was no digging deeper into the answers that were given.

But, I digress, the announcement reads:

"Hello everyone,

Many of you aren't aware of the "legal matter"; a lawsuit was about to be filed if sensitive material, and malign statements were not removed. We have since removed all topics and posts regarding Souza, Mo and badkolo, and www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com. However, all sensitive material was edited out prior to this event, unless we missed it. This consisted of physical addresses and phone numbers, first and last names, IP addresses, etc. Although this was public in other parts of the web, this information was to be kept private. Only the rightful owner should be able to publish it. We ask all members of this board to refrain from discussing and/or bashing Souza, Mo and badkolo, and www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com, or investigating them or their forum. We are here to investigate the 'death' of Michael Jackson and nothing more.

This forum is founded on freedom of speech, as such, we sanctioned all comments about Souza, Mo and badkolo, and www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com. We didn't see a problem with members venting their frustrations, so the comments remained. But the subject matter of Souza, Mo and badkolo, and www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com was not appreciated by the parties at www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com, and it put this forum in peril. Regarding posts of private information, we also experienced this with other members. We tried our best to edit and/or delete posts supplied with these details, but weren't always successful as the number of them increased while we not present. Any private information posted about a member without their consent will result in an immediate ban. Please make note of that. We must remember, even though this is the internet, your actions can have serious consequences. To avoid litigation, we had no choice but to go this route. We hope you understand.

Please see our Forum Rules: http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=2382

Thank you"

Freedom of speech unless it concerns Souza, Mo, or Badkolo? That really isn't free speech. And why can't members talk about the three stooges (Souza, Mo, and Badkolo)? Because of a threatened lawsuit. No actual lawsuit just a threat. An opinion about someone on a forum is not allowed because there may be a lawsuit if the three stooges get mentioned.

Judge: Lara, why did you allow the names Souza, Mo, and Badkolo to be used on your forum?
Lara: Well they are just first names your honor I didn't think it would be an issue. Also Souza, Mo, and Badkolo are not even their real first names.
Judge: Very true.
Lara: It is not like Badkolo's bankruptcy details were posted, or Mo's dog breeding site was mentioned, and nobody even mentioned the 2 bicycles leaning on the tree outside Souza's apartment.
Judge: This is also true. And it is noted by the court that Souza, Mo, and Badkolo are not names which can be identified to any living person; merely names which are used on a Michael Jackson hoax death forum. Case dismissed.

"But the subject matter of Souza, Mo and Badkolo, and www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com was not appreciated by the parties at www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com"

No fucking shit. They don't appreciate people commenting on them. Well if they can't stand the heat get the fuck out the kitchen. You can't come up with theories like an autopsied dog and not expect people to comment on it. The S&M concentration camp forum is "public" meaning that anyone can read it, and by virtue means that people can comment on anything they read on the forum. Are Souza and Mo going to remove all threads regarding Conrad Murray if he gets in touch and says it is not appreciated? Are they fuck.

If you don't want to be commented on don't throw yourself into the forefront of Michael Jackson's hoaxed death. It is that simple.

Lara has been sick as of late, but come on common sense says a threatened lawsuit is just Souza and Mo blowing smoke out of their fat Dutch lesbian asses. If they want to get up in front of a judge and say that they have investigated a theory that the Michael Jackson autopsy was really performed on a dog, and that every musician in the world is controlled by the Illuminati - just say "Bring it on." And as for Badkolo, the fucker is bankrupt, he has no money to launch a lawsuit - he can't even afford to move out of his mother's home.

Seriously, it is pretty sad that someone shouts "lawsuit" and people lose all common sense and panic. Nobody is on about posting all their personal details over the Internet - it is people merely commenting that the three stooges are so fucked in the head and are running a concentration camp. Freedom of speech is exactly that - FREE SPEECH no matter what the subject. If a student can wear a t-shirt that read "FUCK BUSH" at a high school when the president was visiting and not worry about a lawsuit I'm sure that MJHD.NET members can critique the S&M concentration camp and their fucked up theories without a lawsuit happening.

Peace.

Legal Notice: There is no evidence to suggest that Souza and Mo are indeed fat or lesbians. It is merely a comedic statement used for satire. Also it should be noted that Lara of MJHD.NET has not been before a judge with regards to the MJHD.NET forum.

The Police Are Coming

So according to a couple of new posts over at the S&M Nazi forum Mo states that the police are coming! Would that be after the lawsuit that I'm still waiting on?

On the topic imaginatively titled "MJHD Conspiracy" Mo states "Have you seen the sick Hitler related shit this blogger posted about Souza and me? I have reported the blogger to the police. He can talk about freedom of speech and first amendment as much as he likes, but with what he blogged he most certainly broke the law. The police are after him for stalking, defamation of character and copyright infringement. If you agree with the blogger on the things I mentioned above, I rather see you leave."

Let me break it down for the lame lesbian Dutch ass.

Stalking - No. Reading a public forum to decide an opinion doesn't count as stalking.

Defamation of character - No. Once again it is an opinion, mixed with satire and humor, I can say anyone is a lesbian if I think they are doesn't mean it is against the law. If it was against the law Perez Hilton would be doing between 10 to 15 years instead of his blog.

Copyright infringement - No. Just nothing on this blog is an infringement of copyright. Everything on this blog is used under the terms of "Fair Use". Anybody has an issue with anything on this blog that they feel infringes copyright can email me and ask for it to be removed; stating why.

And talking of stalking, defamation of character, copyright infringement let us look at the S&M forum.

Stalking - You follow a hoax. You watch what happens with the Illuminati, Jacksons, and everyone involved more than I follow your forum.

Defamation Of Character - You claim everyone is either a member of the Illuminati or a mind-controlled slave of the Illuminati. Think of how many people you have defamed the character of before you start pointing fingers.

Copyright Infringement - Look at the forum, how many images, videos are of copyrighted material? Think about it.

So Souza and Mo, blow it out your Dutch lesbian asses. You are like Hitler and Goering. Someone on your forum says they agree with some of the things on this blog and you say they can leave. How is dictatorship treating you?

You have admitted following members to see what they write, and you throw people off the forum for having an opinion, and the whole world apart from your lesbian asses is either part of, or controlled by, the Illuminati. Paranoia must be a bitch to live with.

As for the police bullshit. It is just that bullshit. Come on, you threatened a lawsuit and now the police are coming. That is the best you can do. Get off the drugs, and your paranoia will subdue. Take the tin foil hats off and accept the airwaves that the Illuminati are broadcasting 24/7.

Although the police bullshit does prove one thing. I was right about something. Now was it the lesbianism or who certain bloggers were? Or maybe the Hitler/Goering comparison hit a nerve?

And Lisa1232 keep the faith. All you did was say some of this blog made sense, nothing about the Hitler/Goering lesbians and their paranoia.

Peace.

Is MichaelJacksonHoaxDeath Illegal?

Auntie Amy may have been quick out of the gate in setting up MJHD; but was she too quick?

Back in the latter part of September this year, Michael's estate started proceedings, which were eventually filed September 29, 2009, in a Los Angeles court.

The basis of the filing, is that "Allegedly using Michael Jackson's name and likeness without permission, as well as cybersquatting and trademark infringement."

Also, the suit states, "It pertains to the foundation allegedly using Jackson's name. Apparently, they've been doing it to get fans' donations for what appears to be a Jackson-related cause."

The question, therefore, is this: Is MichaelJacksonHoaxDeath.com illegally taking donations because of the words Michael Jackson in the web address?

Surprisingly enough most Intellectual Property lawyers seem to think that all the websites which sprung up after the 'reported death' are illegal; whether they accept donations or not.

The drama, and in-house arguing, over at MJHD could soon be the least of their worries as the Michael Jackson Estate has reportedly said they are looking into this and more lawsuits will be filed so that unscrupulous people cannot defame, or misuse, Michael's name.

Peace.