Google's cached version of MJHD.COM has been one of those recurring questions that just keeps popping up. Did Google cache the MJHD.COM website 2 days before the reported death? Is it a glitch? Is there a way of cheating the Google cache system?
Did Google cache the MJHD.COM website 2 days before the reported death?
No. The first cache of MJHD.COM, completed by Google, was actually done on June 27, 2009. Although the cache did contain the date of June 23. As can be seen by the screenshot it states:
"June 23, 2009 ... We are dedicated to unveilling the Conspiracy and Hoax surrounding the Death of Michael Jackson."
This is not the text from a post. This is a statement from the front page. This is Auntie Amy's opening statement for the website. Which has been on the website since day one.
Is It A Glitch?
Google cache is automatic, run by computers, which means it is open to errors. The way Google caches web pages means that errors in dates can happen, but at the same time the system has functioned very well. Does it mean that June 23, 2009 was definitely a glitch? No; it is merely a possibility.
If we take June 23, 2009 as a glitch, and accept Auntie Amy's email that she posted on MJHD as the real answer. It still leaves the question why was Auntie Amy so quick in declaring the death a hoax?
The email time is shown as being sent at 10.40AM. This would be Auntie Amy's time, which she has openly admitted as being Australian time. So June 26, 2009, at 10:40AM Auntie Amy has the site registered with GoDaddy. The time in Los Angeles is only June 25, 2009, 5:40PM. This means within 2.5 hours of Michael being pronounced dead (2:26 PM PST) Auntie Amy had decided there was a hoax and needed to register a website. And Jermaine didn't come out and do his speech at the hospital until approximately 4:30 PM. So in one hour of Jermaine's speech Auntie Amy decided that something was not right. Just because she is not a fan doesn't mean that she wouldn't have been shocked by this. So being shocked, she registered a website in 2.5 hours of the reported death.
Is there a way of cheating the Google cache system?
Yes. There are in fact two ways to cheat the Google cache system. The first way is through HTML coding, by hiding dates within the coding as comments. The second way is to actually ensure the date appears on the page being cached. With Auntie Amy showing she can HTML code with the ThisIsAlsoIt redirect it is a possibility. But this leads to the question - Why would Auntie Amy cheat the Google cache system to create drama, mystery, and confusion?
Peace.
Showing posts with label Creation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creation. Show all posts
12/16/2009
12/04/2009
June 23, 2009 - Revisted
So this post proves I actually read the comments. And sometimes I even answer them with a post rather than another comment.
Bec asked why the creation date of June 23 had not been covered by this blog. And to be honest the only reason it had not been covered is because I knew there was never going to be a straight answer from Auntie Amy (who I am not and nor am I a sympathiser).
So with the information that I have at hand, which some of it is really old, and taken from old websites which no longer exist, I'll do my best to actually address this issue.
Although the image is kind of small (due to Blogger restrictions) you can click on it to see the full size version.
The part highlighted in red, shows that Google cached a version of MichaelJacksonHoaxDeath.com on June 23, 2009. This was still when the top read "Is Jacko Dead?"
I did some research, and contacted Google, who said that the whole caching of websites is automated and that if website was cached on June 23, 2009 it had to exist at that time. The technician did state that although it may have existed with some HTML coding it may not have been visible if you type the URL in to the address bar. But he was adamant that for Google to cache it the website would have to exist.
When I asked him about getting a copy of the cache from that day for a particular website he said if you can get a federal subpoena then you can get a copy. So basically no luck there.
This raises a couple of questions though. Who is Auntie Amy? What connection, if any, does she have to the whole hoax? And why was the website on the Internet 2 days before the death was reported?
I cannot answer those questions. I have Googled Auntie Amy, and shared the information that has been verified, and proven. As for what connection there is I don't know. If it pisses you off that I don't know everything that is tough. I cannot know everything. As for why the website was up 2 days before the reported death; once again I cannot answer for definite merely speculate that MJHD has some connection.
So in answer to my critic who felt that I never addressed this before. I did, but never was able to find factual answers to the questions that it raised. And without facts, or proof, it would merely be an opinion - of which many people have.
Is the date of June 23 important? Hell yes. Does it tie MJHD into the whole hoax? Definitely. Is Auntie Amy involved in some way? Possibly, but other than she had a website up before the reported death, and was tweeting about the website before the reported death (her account is now deleted that she tweeted from) there is nothing to prove any involvement. Also there is nothing to prove that Amy Sampson is really Amy Sampson - that name could have been pulled off the Internet for all we know.
Ina previous post, I discussed Auntie Amy's reply about June 23, in which she states that it was June 26 the site was registered. The email that she showed on MJHD said 10.40AM which if Amy Sampson is truly Amy Sampson of Queensland would put the registration ahead of the reported death due to the fact that the site had to be registered before they contact to say congratulations it is now registered.
So yes something is very suspicious about MJHD. But proving it becomes difficult. I never gave up on this topic of June 23, just that without more supporting details, and information, it merely is speculation.
Peace.
Bec asked why the creation date of June 23 had not been covered by this blog. And to be honest the only reason it had not been covered is because I knew there was never going to be a straight answer from Auntie Amy (who I am not and nor am I a sympathiser).
So with the information that I have at hand, which some of it is really old, and taken from old websites which no longer exist, I'll do my best to actually address this issue.
Although the image is kind of small (due to Blogger restrictions) you can click on it to see the full size version.
The part highlighted in red, shows that Google cached a version of MichaelJacksonHoaxDeath.com on June 23, 2009. This was still when the top read "Is Jacko Dead?"
I did some research, and contacted Google, who said that the whole caching of websites is automated and that if website was cached on June 23, 2009 it had to exist at that time. The technician did state that although it may have existed with some HTML coding it may not have been visible if you type the URL in to the address bar. But he was adamant that for Google to cache it the website would have to exist.
When I asked him about getting a copy of the cache from that day for a particular website he said if you can get a federal subpoena then you can get a copy. So basically no luck there.
This raises a couple of questions though. Who is Auntie Amy? What connection, if any, does she have to the whole hoax? And why was the website on the Internet 2 days before the death was reported?
I cannot answer those questions. I have Googled Auntie Amy, and shared the information that has been verified, and proven. As for what connection there is I don't know. If it pisses you off that I don't know everything that is tough. I cannot know everything. As for why the website was up 2 days before the reported death; once again I cannot answer for definite merely speculate that MJHD has some connection.
So in answer to my critic who felt that I never addressed this before. I did, but never was able to find factual answers to the questions that it raised. And without facts, or proof, it would merely be an opinion - of which many people have.
Is the date of June 23 important? Hell yes. Does it tie MJHD into the whole hoax? Definitely. Is Auntie Amy involved in some way? Possibly, but other than she had a website up before the reported death, and was tweeting about the website before the reported death (her account is now deleted that she tweeted from) there is nothing to prove any involvement. Also there is nothing to prove that Amy Sampson is really Amy Sampson - that name could have been pulled off the Internet for all we know.
Ina previous post, I discussed Auntie Amy's reply about June 23, in which she states that it was June 26 the site was registered. The email that she showed on MJHD said 10.40AM which if Amy Sampson is truly Amy Sampson of Queensland would put the registration ahead of the reported death due to the fact that the site had to be registered before they contact to say congratulations it is now registered.
So yes something is very suspicious about MJHD. But proving it becomes difficult. I never gave up on this topic of June 23, just that without more supporting details, and information, it merely is speculation.
Peace.
9/04/2009
Looking At Admin's Answer To The Creation Date
On the MJHD website, the Admin, who named herself as Amy and living in Australia, stated that "The image (above) is the email I received from my previous Web Host, NTC Hosting on Friday 26th June, when my website was added to my hosting account."
If we look at that email, the answer that is given raises more questions.
According to the email posted on the MJHD website it was sent on Friday, June 26, 2009 at 10.40AM. As can be seen from the image, the email was in Outlook. Therefore the 10.40AM is local time for the Admin, Amy in Australia, and would therefore be 17 hours ahead of California's time. This would mean that NTC Hosting sent confirmation of the website registration at 5.40PM in California; just 3 hours and 18 minutes after Michael's reported death.
When was MJHD.com created?
This question has been asked over and over in the forums of MJHD. Some are sure that it was started before Michael Jackson's reported death of June 25, 2009, because of Google caching. In the Google cache it is shown that a comment was made on June 23, 2009 which Google cached as "We are dedicated to unveiling the conspiracy and hoax surrounding the death of Michael Jackson."
This has been put down to a glitch by Google by the Admin of MJHD. Read the full explanation by the Admin of MJHD here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
