Showing posts with label Bec. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bec. Show all posts
1/10/2012
To Believe Or Not To Believe
Shakespeare is dead; and has been for a few hundred years so the world can steal and fuck his quotes over however they wish.
To believe or not to believe the bullshit that is undergone at the Nazi HQ known as MJDHI. Well, the obvious answer is to not believe anything that falls out the cesspit of the whole hoax.
Front, Back, or Bec, or whoever is claiming to be the insider this week along with the everlasting TS is the official 'inside' voice of the Michael Jackson death hoax? Really? Because I swear to some God that when Front and Back first started the Admin of MJDHI and Bec were so certain that I was Front or Back because we both used the word "Atlas".
But no that has been forgotten now and because Souza and her new pussy-licking bitch Bec have said so Front or Back is actually an insider that knows what is going on. Hang on. Knows what is going on? Is Backwards actually Jackie Jackson? It could be. Hell it might even be Larry King - he's not exactly busy anymore.
What happened to all the other certainties? What happened to the whole "Where The Wild Things Are" theory? What happened to the "Double Bam" theory? Did that canceled because Elvis is in Las Vegas? What happened to the "Twin" theory? What happened to the "Dog Autopsy" theory?
All of these supposed 'on the money' theories are lost in the annals of hoax history because they were nothing more than guesses.
So why are the members of MJDHI so willing to believe that a few fucked up cryptic bullshit quotes and redirects mean anything? Because if they don't they get belittled by the Admin followed by Bec, still liking her lips after licking Souza's ass, and then all the people that will blindly follow these cunts without questioning anything.
Why has none of the members ever asked TS, Front, or Back to just say something in clear English which has not happened, and is not already common knowledge among Michael Jackson fans, that will happen. Come on, surely one of these three insiders can give a clear answer to something that will happen.
Just to give them a helping hand here is the layout that can be used:
DATE: (The exact date of a forthcoming event - after all they are an insider they should know.)
TIME: (OK The time might be difficult - lets make it easy and leave it in Dutch time.)
EVENT: (The exact details of the event. Not something like "An album will be released." And make sure you name where it will take place exactly and who will be there.)
TIME OF POST: (The time they posted it to the forum - so when it is found on the Internet from 3 days ago it can be proven.)
That is not too much to ask. Come on. Supposedly these mental patients are insiders to the biggest hoax in the world. A simple exclusive of an event, with specific details not available anywhere on the 'net, shouldn't be such a hard a thing. And having it in plain English shouldn't be too much to ask. No cryptic bullshit where you have to divide the number of times Bec has dreamed of licking Souza out by the number of times Souza has logged in as people other than herself. Just plain English.
But it won't happen. Why? Because these cum-guzzling sacks of shit know nothing more than anyone else. Don't believe me? Disagree with them and watch how fast you get banned or belittled by the Nazi bitch Admin and her cunt-licking sheep Bec.
And the reason you can't ask questions? Because these lying sacks of shit can't back up anything they say. Not a thing. Nothing they have said was not common knowledge already. And all the numerical mind-fuckery is just that. Look at the mathematical bullshit TS keeps spewing out - the equation changes to fit the answer. If it was all some numerical quest the one constant would be the equation not the answer.
Follow this shit if you want. After all who am I to say what is wrong? But seriously while you read the drivel of supposed 'insider information' at least look at it with an open mind; and not just take what is being forced down your throats as gospel.
12/04/2009
June 23, 2009 - Revisted
So this post proves I actually read the comments. And sometimes I even answer them with a post rather than another comment.
Bec asked why the creation date of June 23 had not been covered by this blog. And to be honest the only reason it had not been covered is because I knew there was never going to be a straight answer from Auntie Amy (who I am not and nor am I a sympathiser).
So with the information that I have at hand, which some of it is really old, and taken from old websites which no longer exist, I'll do my best to actually address this issue.
Although the image is kind of small (due to Blogger restrictions) you can click on it to see the full size version.
The part highlighted in red, shows that Google cached a version of MichaelJacksonHoaxDeath.com on June 23, 2009. This was still when the top read "Is Jacko Dead?"
I did some research, and contacted Google, who said that the whole caching of websites is automated and that if website was cached on June 23, 2009 it had to exist at that time. The technician did state that although it may have existed with some HTML coding it may not have been visible if you type the URL in to the address bar. But he was adamant that for Google to cache it the website would have to exist.
When I asked him about getting a copy of the cache from that day for a particular website he said if you can get a federal subpoena then you can get a copy. So basically no luck there.
This raises a couple of questions though. Who is Auntie Amy? What connection, if any, does she have to the whole hoax? And why was the website on the Internet 2 days before the death was reported?
I cannot answer those questions. I have Googled Auntie Amy, and shared the information that has been verified, and proven. As for what connection there is I don't know. If it pisses you off that I don't know everything that is tough. I cannot know everything. As for why the website was up 2 days before the reported death; once again I cannot answer for definite merely speculate that MJHD has some connection.
So in answer to my critic who felt that I never addressed this before. I did, but never was able to find factual answers to the questions that it raised. And without facts, or proof, it would merely be an opinion - of which many people have.
Is the date of June 23 important? Hell yes. Does it tie MJHD into the whole hoax? Definitely. Is Auntie Amy involved in some way? Possibly, but other than she had a website up before the reported death, and was tweeting about the website before the reported death (her account is now deleted that she tweeted from) there is nothing to prove any involvement. Also there is nothing to prove that Amy Sampson is really Amy Sampson - that name could have been pulled off the Internet for all we know.
Ina previous post, I discussed Auntie Amy's reply about June 23, in which she states that it was June 26 the site was registered. The email that she showed on MJHD said 10.40AM which if Amy Sampson is truly Amy Sampson of Queensland would put the registration ahead of the reported death due to the fact that the site had to be registered before they contact to say congratulations it is now registered.
So yes something is very suspicious about MJHD. But proving it becomes difficult. I never gave up on this topic of June 23, just that without more supporting details, and information, it merely is speculation.
Peace.
Bec asked why the creation date of June 23 had not been covered by this blog. And to be honest the only reason it had not been covered is because I knew there was never going to be a straight answer from Auntie Amy (who I am not and nor am I a sympathiser).
So with the information that I have at hand, which some of it is really old, and taken from old websites which no longer exist, I'll do my best to actually address this issue.
Although the image is kind of small (due to Blogger restrictions) you can click on it to see the full size version.
The part highlighted in red, shows that Google cached a version of MichaelJacksonHoaxDeath.com on June 23, 2009. This was still when the top read "Is Jacko Dead?"
I did some research, and contacted Google, who said that the whole caching of websites is automated and that if website was cached on June 23, 2009 it had to exist at that time. The technician did state that although it may have existed with some HTML coding it may not have been visible if you type the URL in to the address bar. But he was adamant that for Google to cache it the website would have to exist.
When I asked him about getting a copy of the cache from that day for a particular website he said if you can get a federal subpoena then you can get a copy. So basically no luck there.
This raises a couple of questions though. Who is Auntie Amy? What connection, if any, does she have to the whole hoax? And why was the website on the Internet 2 days before the death was reported?
I cannot answer those questions. I have Googled Auntie Amy, and shared the information that has been verified, and proven. As for what connection there is I don't know. If it pisses you off that I don't know everything that is tough. I cannot know everything. As for why the website was up 2 days before the reported death; once again I cannot answer for definite merely speculate that MJHD has some connection.
So in answer to my critic who felt that I never addressed this before. I did, but never was able to find factual answers to the questions that it raised. And without facts, or proof, it would merely be an opinion - of which many people have.
Is the date of June 23 important? Hell yes. Does it tie MJHD into the whole hoax? Definitely. Is Auntie Amy involved in some way? Possibly, but other than she had a website up before the reported death, and was tweeting about the website before the reported death (her account is now deleted that she tweeted from) there is nothing to prove any involvement. Also there is nothing to prove that Amy Sampson is really Amy Sampson - that name could have been pulled off the Internet for all we know.
Ina previous post, I discussed Auntie Amy's reply about June 23, in which she states that it was June 26 the site was registered. The email that she showed on MJHD said 10.40AM which if Amy Sampson is truly Amy Sampson of Queensland would put the registration ahead of the reported death due to the fact that the site had to be registered before they contact to say congratulations it is now registered.
So yes something is very suspicious about MJHD. But proving it becomes difficult. I never gave up on this topic of June 23, just that without more supporting details, and information, it merely is speculation.
Peace.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
