12/04/2010

Interview With MJHDC

As a credit to dementia I decided to interview myself. Fuck knows what Freud would think. However, it does answer a lot questions I have been asked time and time again.

So before I get locked in some mental institute, drugged up and drooling on myself, here is the full unedited interview (or ramblings) with me by me. And to any directors of mental institutes reading this - I want an XL strait jacket so it hangs right.

MJHDC: So your twisted mind created the MJHDC persona; why was that?
Me: Mainly because there was so much bullshit surrounding the forums covering the Michael Jackson hoax death.
MJHDC: I take it you mean Amy Sampson who started MJHD.COM?
Me: Amy was just the start of it all. But unfortunately as with anything you let one dumb fuck do what they want, unopposed, a million more fuckers will follow.
MJHDC: So your initial purpose was to attack Amy Sampson?
Me: No. Everyone thought that for some reason. My initial purpose was to answer all the questions that Amy, as admin of MJHD.COM, refused to answer.
MJHDC: But it didn't stop there. It was like a constant attack on her.
Me: Oh poor Amy and all that happy horse shit. It didn't stop because as I looked into the forum more and more bullshit appeared. The diaper wearing bitch was creating false members, commenting under other account names, and unwilling to admit what her real purpose was. So although it may seem like a constant attack it was just as information came up I posted it; and added the humor for the hell of it.
MJHDC: The diaper wearing - was that really necessary?
Me: Yeah it was. Amy was trying to paint this picture that butter wouldn't melt in her mouth; yet away from the forum she was a completely different person. I just felt that people had a right to know. There was people supporting Amy on the forum that really knew nothing about her. I just thought 'fuck this, if you want to support this fucker you might as well know what you are really supporting'.
MJHDC: So through your blog you feel you are some crusader of justice?
Me: Fuck no. It is just an opinion. It is my take on things. If I think something is wrong I just say it. I don't need anyone to agree with it; its not about popularity. If I was worried about being popular and all that shit I'd be posting about Saint Michael and handing out sunflowers.
MJHDC: But isn't your opinion sometimes crude, vulgar, and down right offensive?
Me: Sometimes. Sure. But the world is sometimes crude, vulgar, and offensive. People are dying needlessly, drug addiction is constantly rising, and the between the rich and the poor is forever widening. Then you have all these little fucking wars. That is reality - reality is not all rainbows, flowers, and candy floss.
MJHDC: So what happened to the bulldog?
Me: The flea ridden mutt got put down. Well, some wish it had. The blog changed. It started off as this blog about semi-serious issues but as some of the hoaxers started taking themselves too seriously I figuratively stepped back and laughed. Hence the Joker. Too many people involved in investigating the hoax are taking things too seriously; like they are the main reason the hoax exists and it is bullshit. If the hoax exists is is because of Michael Jackson and nobody else.
MJHDC: You said "if the hoax exists", does that mean you think it doesn't?
Me: I don't know. I wouldn't want to put my life on the line and say 100% that Michael Jackson is alive. But then again there are some fucked up things that have happened since June 25, 2009 that suggest Michael Jackson did fake his death. I am like so many others - some days it all makes sense but then other days I feel if he faked his death why is allowing some of the shit that goes on? I mean if you were Michael Jackson would you really allow the Californian raisin, Jermaine, to murder your songs in a so-called tribute?
MJHDC: You have been pretty vocal on your criticism of the Jackson family. Some have suggested it is very disrespectful.
Me: That goes back to me not giving a shit if people agree or not. It is just how I see it.You have all these fuckers saying Boycott Sony and Oprah because they are just making money off Michael's name. But the family is no different. Where were these cunts when Michael needed them? Absolutely nowhere to be seen. Now he is either hiding, or dead, and these fucking leeches crawl out of the woodwork bleating about Michael for their own personal fame and fortune. So it is alright to use and abuse Michael's name, and legacy, as long as you are a Jackson? Bullshit, the fuckers are no better than Shmuley, Faye, Bashir, and all the other cunts that are using Michael's name as a stepping stone to further themselves.
MJHDC: So you are saying there is no difference between Katherine Jackson and Rabbi Shmuley?
Me: None whatsoever. They both wrote books to cash in on Michael's name; and in both cases it is something they should have kept to themselves.
MJHDC: Some would suggest the same of your opinion; and you should keep it to yourself.
Me: It is an opinion. I don't force anyone to read it. I don't go round pointing a gun at peoples heads or anything. They don't want to read it that is fine with me. They don't like what I say they can fuck off to somewhere warm, fluffy, and cozy. They can go to MJHD.NET and have a bunch of flowers shoved up their ass for all I care. I write whatever I'm thinking with regards to the hoax and that is all.
MJHDC: Some claim your blog shows signs of racism and homophobia and that basically you are not a nice person. Why do you say some of the things you say?
Me: Once again it is merely my opinion. The calls about racism started when I began calling Souza and Mo Nazis. People took that the wrong way. It wasn't that the Dutch lesbians were white supremacists it was the way they were acting like fucking dictators. I could have quite easily called Souza Pol Pot; it is just Hitler, and the Nazis, are more universally known. As for me being homophobic - if people want to think it is alright for a guy to blow another guy or a woman to eat another woman's fish taco that is their opinion not mine. I just think it is disgusting.
MJHDC: So the treatment of Badkolo is because he is gay?
Me: Not entirely. The fact the faggot is going to burn in hell just adds fuel to the fire so to speak. He gets attacked for being part of the Nazi forum. Putting forum members down if their opinion is in disagreement with his or the Dutch lesbians. He comes in like forum security or some shit. It is like sending fucking Big Bird in to break up a riot. You just have to laugh at the stupidity of the whole situation.
MJHDC: I think some of the calls of racism are because of the Bin Laden post.
Me: So it is racist to poke fun at Bin Laden? He may be a Muslim but I didn't pick him because of that; I picked him because of his infamy and allegedly being the most wanted man in the world. He could of been a Christian, Buddhist, or some fucking cult leader for all I cared. The fact he is a Muslim doesn't mean shit. Some Muslims are fucktards but in the same breath every religion has a few fucktards. As an atheist it really makes no difference to me if he is praying to Allah, God, Buddha, or fucking Jim Jones.
MJHDC: As an atheist what is your opinion on the biblical connections to the hoax?
Me: Bullshit. Even if I wasn't an atheist I'd still think it smelled fishier than a whore's cunt. Seriously, I don't think the hoax is as complicated as it is being made out. All this fucking crap about Bible passages and numerology. Did Michael start planning this hoax ten years ago? If all biblical, numerical, and symbolism shit was anything more than pure coincidence it would have took ages to figure and plan it all. In my opinion Michael wanted out for a reason and got the fuck out of Dodge. Simple as that.
MJHDC: So you don't go along with the TS/TIAI posts then?
Me: You have to be fucking kidding me. Anyone can make anything fit a particular theory if they put time into it. But seriously none of it makes sense. There is no pattern to the calculations. On some dates you ignore the year, and then when it comes to calculating dates you add certain numbers and subtract others. For it to be a plausible idea it needs consistency; and that is just not there. June 25, 2009. Ignore the zeros and you have 6 25 29 which if you add the 2 and 5 you get 7. Then 9 subtract the 2 gives you another 7. So you have two 7's. So the June is off. So should Michael have waited until July to fake his death?
MJHDC: Some have said you give the hoax a bad name. Do you?
Me: Yes and no. If you read the blog then all the profanity would suggest I give the hoax a bad name. But at the same time if you read the blog, the actual meat of it, it is just an opinion. I don't try and speak for the hoax I just give my own opinon on things.
MJHDC: Why do you end each post with "Peace." when a lot of what you write is anger and hatred?
Me: Because I can. The anger and hatred is aimed at specific people and things; not everyone. We all hate something. Hell, Michael hated himself hated Mottola. The peace at the end of each post is merely there to mark the end of the post. I could have put 'Over and out.' but it is a blog not a fucking CB radio.
MJHDC: Where do you see the hoax going?
Me: Downhill very fast. I have been involved with the whole hoax investigation since early July 2009 and have watched it slowly deteriorate. Back in the beginning people wanted proof for every suggestion made. Now they will blindly follow any idea without questioning it. That is not to say there are no good 'hoax investigators' left it is merely that the investigating is slowly being drowned in a sea of bullshit. In the beginning if someone suggested there was a video of Michael Jackson alive everyone would have asked where is the video, who gave the video, and can the person prove it. Now, though, a claim like that is made and all the sheeple just agree with it without even questioning it. And when it is proven to be complete bullshit most don't bother to question the person and their intentions for such a lie. Add in all the dumbasses that think they talk to Michael Jackson on Twitter and Facebook and you have what appears to be a very bad joke instead of a hoax. If Michael Jackson faked his death, for whatever reason, he isnt going to risk being found by talking to some random fan on Twitter or Facebook. But if you believe he is I have some nails used in the alleged crucifixion of Jesus for sale.
MJHDC: Finally, will the bulldog ever return?
Me: Maybe. Who knows. I still have information pouring in. I don't gather all the information. People, who wish to remain anonymous, supply a lot of information too. Some wish to remain anonymous because they are members of certain forums, some just wish to pass on information without being named. You'd be surprised at how much backstabbing goes on - I even have people who are online friends with Souza and Mo giving information when they think something is wrong. So there is plenty of bite left in the dog just right now it is more fun to do a humorous look at the whole hoax and the people involved in it.

Peace.

Cuss Count: Extreme

Legal Notice: I have never been officially certified insane; although this may indeed be evidence for such a case. This post is merely opinion. I could mention satire but then people would miss the reality that the hoax is being fucked over by bullshit artists and egomaniacs that think Michael's message is them ... Fucking tards.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

(Smiling)

Anonymous said...

Doggie, I have a technology question to ask you: how many minutes do you need to write a so long essay? I guess you just write it down and needn't waste much time to refine it... right? Though it does look like totally refined. Thanks for answer!

MJHD Conspiracy said...

Anonymous said: "Doggie, I have a technology question to ask you: how many minutes do you need to write a so long essay? I guess you just write it down and needn't waste much time to refine it... right? Though it does look like totally refined. Thanks for answer!"

Usually about 20 to 30 minutes. Some a little longer and some a little shorter. It totally depends on each post. As for the refining, there really is none. I just type it as I'd say it which means most English language professors would have a fit at it - LOL.

Anonymous said...

Is it just me or is Souza this TS?? They sound alike and both use the phrase "nuff said" all the time, and souza is the first to jump to the defense of TS when their validity is being questioned, I really think Souza would do that because she is deperate for people to believe in her version of the hoax.

Also, I love this blog! <3

Anonymous said...

thanks for answer! I wish I can write as good as you do! :D

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 4:58 pm: "nuff said" souza keeps repeating it and keeps on talking at the same time...rofl!
BTW MJHDC have you seen the latest chaos at Mo's and Souza's/Souza's and Mo's (one has to be carefull these days..bwahaha)forum?? Great script once again...this turns out to be even better than 'days of our lives' or even 'the bold and the beautiful' (though don't think one of them is bold..haha
You just have to be best friends to pull something like this off...and the best part?? Every member (excepting a few) of that forum falls for it and is desperately trying to reunite them (mind you in these cold days a bowl of hot soup is always welcome) and once more...manipulation, manipulation!! You gotta give them that they're master puppeteers..roflmao

Post a Comment